Return to the Fayetteville State University Home Page

Purchasing - Division of Business and Finance

FSU HomeFSUBOPurchasingGeneral Purchasing InformationSole and Single Source Purchasing

Sole and Single Source Purchasing

Sole and single source purchasing is an exception to State statutes and purchasing policies. The final determination as to whether such an exception request is valid will be made by the Purchasing Department and rest on the existence of a valid supportable requirement which is adequately documented. Requirements exceeding the university purchasing benchmark ($50,000) will be forwarded to the State Purchase and Contract for processing and, if deemed justifiable, will be certified as "single" or "sole source" and purchased without recourse to formal solicitation.

Sole source and single source purchases are segregable in definition and use. The common thread, however, through each type of purchase is that a justification to procure from a sole or single source cannot be solely based on quality or price. (Quality can be a subjective evaluation and pricing subject to the level of competition.)

A. Sole Source

Sole Source applies when it can be substantiated that a requirement involves commodity or service provided by only one vendor or contractor having exclusive rights (e.g., rights to data, patent or copy rights, proprietary interests, or secret processes) to the manufacturing of the product or service. Sole source requirements must withstand two questions: (1) Is the commodity or service the only one of its kind that can fully satisfy the requirement? (2) Is the commodity available from one and only one source? In this context, "sole" means the only one.

Single Source applies when it can be substantiated that a commodity or service can be obtained only from one vendor or contractor that often is the single representative of the manufacturer or principal company. Single source purchases frequently involve a vendor or contractor whose product or service is discernibly distinguishable from all others in the market and singularly meets all significant elements of the university's requirement. In this context, "single" means "the one among others."

Brand Name specificity does not necessarily equate to a "Sole Source" or a "Single Source" purchase. "Brand Name" requirements typically are peculiar to one manufacturer but not one supplier. Accordingly, "Brand Name" requirements may not satisfy the criteria of either "Sole Source," or "Single Source" practices as several vendors or contractors may be able to provide the product or service, and therefore, the requirement can be competitively awarded. Purchasing specifications, in this instance, will provide for "Brand Name or Equal" specifications that identify the important features of the requirement in a non-restrictive manner.

Comparable is defined as equal in those specific areas of specification or performance that must be provided to allow the commodity's use or service to be provided as it is intended or required. That is, a product or service may be argued as "comparable" when it meets the key specific levels of function although it does not explicitly meet all specifications. In this context, "comparable" may be acceptable.

University Standard determinations may apply and support a "Sole Source" or a "Single Source" purchase where it can be clearly demonstrated that the university has formally adopted the particular commodity or service for campus-wide required use and standardization. Such a "standard" is typically published in some form of university document.

Performance Specifications are to be used, whenever feasible, to describe requirements. Performance specifications detail an expected outcome or result rather than the processes required arriving at the outcome or result and, as such, contributing to competition.

State Purchasing policy provides for exclusionary purchasing practices that can be avoided by writing specifications which invite maximum reasonable competition and are not unduly restrictive. Accordingly, requirements submitted for purchasing are to be accompanied by specifications which encourage competition, consistent with the particular need.

B. Request for Exception

 Both "Sole Source" and "Single Source" purchases must be able to withstand the scrutiny of the test of "no alternatives." The submittal of such a request and its documentation represent a good faith certification on behalf of the campus department and the signature as well as the ability to substantiate the request and sustain any inquiries.

The determination as to whether to accept and act upon a "Sole Source" or "Single Source" request relies on the reasonability of the request and the clear demonstration that the campus department has completed a comprehensive market survey where the investigation, evaluation, and documentation of alternative sources and products or services leaves no doubt as to the course which the university has elected in the purchase. Key to this research is the use of specifications which only state the important aspects of the requirement and can provide for the purchase of the minimally acceptable quality necessary to perform a given task or function satisfactorily at the lowest fair and reasonable cost.

  • "Sole Source" and "Single Source" requests are not to be submitted in the following instances:
  • Personal preference for a product, brand, or vendor exists.
  • Costs, vendor performance, and delivery are the justification; these elements are considered in the evaluation for award factors.
  • The statement of "no substitution" is the only rationale.
  • Lack of planning exists on behalf of the requiring department.
  • The justification is solely based on quality or price and immediate availability for delivery.
  • Offers of trade-in allowances, no cost options or accessories, or special "package' or "deals" are made [FSU1].

C. Documentation of Request

Where there is a reasonable basis to conclude that the minimum needs of the university can be met by unique commodities or services only from a "Sole Source" or "Single Source," the campus department will accompany its submittal with a memorandum which addresses the following items:

  • A statement to the fact that the campus department/individual recognizes that State purchasing practices require the use of competitive means whenever practicable; but that an exception is requested for the reasons recorded in the memorandum.
  • A thorough explanation as to how it has been determined that the criterion of "Sole Source" or "Single Source" applies to the requirement. The definitions of these conditions provide the baseline for this narrative as well as the description of the market survey and its results.
  • An explanation as to whether the requirement can or cannot be purchased from another vendor or contractor. Identify all other vendors or contractors included in the "market survey" and their commodities or services as well as explicitly specify their reason(s) for unacceptability.
  • An explanation as to those features of the requirement, which are considered unique and essential to the mission and in the operations of the campus department. Relate these features to and describe the mission or operation and the item's use.
  • Describe any performance features and address their availability otherwise in the market. Discuss "comparable" products or services and detail why these are not acceptable.
  • Describe any integral nature of the requirement that lends itself to being compatible with existing equipment or practices. Specifically address requisite technical specifications and any associated research protocol, instructional goals, etc.
  • Describe how the specified purchase will contribute to any issue of commonality and standardization.
  • Discuss any appointment of a "sole regional manufacturer's/company's representative" and evidence of such with the manufacturer's/company's statement to this effect on its letterhead.
  •  Attach any and all copies of correspondence, including any vendor quotations received in the selection of requirement.

When a "Single Source" requirement entails the purchase of a commodity or service from a vendor who has been appointed as the manufacturer's sole regional representative, the purchase must be documented by the manufacturer's own signed certification and statement of such fact on its letterhead. This statement must be issued by the manufacturer's corporate headquarters, not a regional office, and be secured by the requiring department. All documentation must be sent to Purchasing .

 

Fayetteville State University1200 Murchison Road • Fayetteville, NC 28301 • 910.672.1111
Copyright © • A Constituent Institution of The University of North CarolinaContact Us